Skip to main content

Leather Pouch with Glass Vials

Object
Leather pouch exterior before conservation

We’re having a throwback blog this week to look in more detail at an object that’s been on display in the department for about a year. The object in question is a leather pouch with a number of glass vials and is from Beamish museum, an amazing ‘living’ museum in the north of England. We get  a lot of weird and wonderful objects from Beamish and they’re always a favourite of the students when it comes to the Conservation Practice module over the summer. A number of them also go out on display so if you keep a look out you might see some of the objects featured on our blog around the Beamish site!

Leather pouch interior before conservation

This particular leather pouch is possibly made of fish skin rather than mammalian skin as there is a distinct lack of hair follicles on the surface. Within the pouch are a number of glass vials each with a, once liquid, substance in them. Comparative examples and the paper list found inside the pouch, indicate that these vials are filled with a variety of varnishes, which would possibly have been used to show prospective customers the range of varnishes on offer.

Although it isn’t known exactly where the pouch and vials came from, it could be that they were from a local company making coach varnish. It wasn’t unusual for salesmen to have samples of products and to show them to customers and prospective buyers; this is something that is still seen today though not nearly as widespread as it once was.

Condition
  • Discolouration of the paper notecard as well as dryness and fragility around the edges.
  • Dirt and dust on the surface of the leather.
  • Evidence of mould growth on the leather.
  • Evidence of insect attack on the leather and cork stoppers.
  • Surface dirt on the glass vials.
  • Corrosion of the metal clasp.
Conservation
Leather pouch exterior after conservation

As there were signs of an insect infestation the leather pouch was wrapped and placed into a freezer for two weeks to ensure no insects remained alive. This would ensure that there was no further damage to the leather pouch, no other objects would become infested and the infestation would not return to the museum.

Once the pouch was removed from the freezer the mould on the surface needed to be treated in order to prevent further deterioration and to protect visitors as mould spores can be inhaled and cause illness. The pouch and its contents were first vacuumed in order to remove large surface deposits of mould and dirt, this then allowed for leather, paper and glass vials to be treated more accurately.

  • The leather was sprayed with a mixture of solvents designed to kill mould spores.
  • The paper was treated using cotton swabs and a slightly different solvent mixture in order to kill the mould spores without damaging the paper.
  • The glass vials were swabbed using a pure solvent to treat the mould spores.
Leather pouch interior after conservation

After testing a variety of dry cleaning methods on aged newspaper, the notepaper and ink were surface cleaned using vinyl eraser as this proved most effective at removing surface dirt without damaging the writing. Although the leather had been vacuumed and treated using solvent there was still evidence of ingrained dirt on the surface. To remove this a combination of smoke sponge and vinyl eraser were used and the leather looked noticeably cleaner on completion.

The metal clasp showed some signs of discolouration and corrosion, which needed to be removed in order to allow the clasp to function correctly. The metal was surface cleaned using cotton wool swabs and an appropriate solvent before being treated with a mild abrasive in order to remove the corrosion. Finally the metal was consolidated in order to help prevent corrosion in the future.

As well as surface dirt and mould growth the leather pouch had suffered some shrinkage, likely due to environmental changes during storage. In order to re-adhere the flaps and physically stabilise the pouch the leather required humidification to assist with reshaping. A ‘sandwich’ of Sympatex, acid free tissue and aluminium foil was placed around the leather and then an ultrasonic humidifier was used to dampen the leather. It was then dried under pressure to ensure it would dry flat. All areas of loss were strengthened and supported by adhering Japanese tissue in strips, which were then colour matched in order to minimise their obtrusiveness.

5 Comments

  1. Hi Vicky, great to see a conservation blog on a leather object. I just wanted to give some feedback on your conclusion of the pouch being made of fish skin. Just because you cant see the grain, doesnt mean the leather is made from non-mammalian skin. Fish skin is very different in look, feel and appearance. judging by the phoots, this object looks to be leather or one of its many look-alikes. A lot of archaeological leather artefacts for example dont show a grain pattern anymore, as they have been well used (abraded) or the preservation is not good enough for the grain to survive. Since this is a historical artefact, I was wondering whether you had considered any of the many techniques employed to mark or fashion leather to look like something different all together? such as stamps or imprints. best wishes, Angela Middleton (Archaeological Conservator)
    1. Hi Angela, Thanks for your comment. This object was actually researched and worked on by one of our students last year, so they were the one who came to the conclusion of it possibly being fish skin. They actually discussed the object with another conservator who knew a bit more about leathers and they were the one who suggested it may be fish skin and when the student examined further they also considered this could be the case. Best wishes, Vicky
  2. Interesting blogs, particularly this one. However, I agree with above comment - I am pretty sure this is not fish skin. I am happy to give you more information if you wish as to what it may be. Regards Yvette Fletcher, Head of Conservation, The Leather Conservation Centre
  3. Hi Yvette, Nice to hear from you. This was an object researched and worked on by one of our students last year. They'd had a chat with a visiting conservator who knew a bit about leathers and they were the one who suggested fish skin, though of course there's nothing to say they weren't incorrect. The student did do some follow up research and agreed they thought it was fish skin, but again they could also be incorrect. The object is now back with Beamish Museum but it's interesting to hear other views and opinons on what the leather might be. Best wishes, Vicky
  4. Hi Yvette, Nice to hear from you. This was an object researched and worked on by one of our students last year. They'd had a chat with a visiting conservator who knew a bit about leathers and they were the one who suggested fish skin, though of course there's nothing to say they weren't incorrect. The student did do some follow up research and agreed they thought it was fish skin, but again they could also be incorrect. The object is now back with Beamish Museum but it's interesting to hear other views and opinons on what the leather might be. Best wishes, Vicky

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *